Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/11/13 07:32, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> > 2013-11-11 Ulrich Weigand
> >
> > * calls.c (store_unaligned_arguments_into_pseudos): Skip PARALLEL
> > arguments.
> OK, so after a lot of worrying, I think this is OK. I kept thinking
> this had to tie into the BLKmode ret
On 11/11/13 07:32, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Hello,
when implementing the new ABI for powerpc64le-linux, I ran into an assertion
failure in store_unaligned_arguments_into_pseudos:
gcc_assert (args[i].partial % UNITS_PER_WORD == 0);
This can happen in the new ABI since we pass "homogene
On 11/11/13 12:10, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/11/13 07:32, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
However, looking more closely, it seems store_unaligned_arguments_into_pseudos
is not really useful for PARALLEL arguments in the first place. What this
routine does is load arguments into args[i]
Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/11/13 07:32, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> > However, looking more closely, it seems
> > store_unaligned_arguments_into_pseudos
> > is not really useful for PARALLEL arguments in the first place. What this
> > routine does is load arguments into args[i].aligned_regs. But if we
On 11/11/13 07:32, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Hello,
when implementing the new ABI for powerpc64le-linux, I ran into an assertion
failure in store_unaligned_arguments_into_pseudos:
gcc_assert (args[i].partial % UNITS_PER_WORD == 0);
This can happen in the new ABI since we pass "homogene
Hello,
when implementing the new ABI for powerpc64le-linux, I ran into an assertion
failure in store_unaligned_arguments_into_pseudos:
gcc_assert (args[i].partial % UNITS_PER_WORD == 0);
This can happen in the new ABI since we pass "homogeneous structures"
consisting of soleley floati
