On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:53:40PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> DW_AT_data_location needs to be the data pointer, which is at offset 0,
> but we were emitting a bogus +8 in that case (+4 for 32-bit targets).
>
> With this patch, the change on -g -dA is:
> - .uleb128 0x4# DW_AT_data_l
Hi!
DW_AT_data_location needs to be the data pointer, which is at offset 0,
but we were emitting a bogus +8 in that case (+4 for 32-bit targets).
With this patch, the change on -g -dA is:
- .uleb128 0x4# DW_AT_data_location
+ .uleb128 0x2# DW_AT_data_location
.byte 0
