gen; Maxim Kuvyrkov; GCC Patches; nd
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix computation of register limit for -fsched-pressure
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Tamar Christina
wrote:
> Looking at it again,
>
> it seems to be that the testcase should be adjusted.
> There's no actual spilling. It ju
On 10/28/2016 06:38 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Tamar Christina
> wrote:
>> > Looking at it again,
>> >
>> > it seems to be that the testcase should be adjusted.
>> > There's no actual spilling. It just uses more registers than before due to
>> > the scheduling.
> Sor
ina
> Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 10:53:20 AM
> To: Pat Haugen; Maxim Kuvyrkov
> Cc: GCC Patches; nd
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix computation of register limit for -fsched-pressure
>
> Forwarding to list as well.
>
> From: Tamar
f
of Tamar Christina
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 10:53:20 AM
To: Pat Haugen; Maxim Kuvyrkov
Cc: GCC Patches; nd
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix computation of register limit for -fsched-pressure
Forwarding to list as well.
From: Tamar Christina
Sent: Friday, Oc
Forwarding to list as well.
From: Tamar Christina
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 10:52:17 AM
To: Pat Haugen; Maxim Kuvyrkov
Cc: GCC Patches
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix computation of register limit for -fsched-pressure
Hi Pat,
The commit seems to be causing
On 10/18/2016 05:31 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
>> > I see your point and agree that current code isn't optimal. However, I
>> > don't think your patch is accurate either. Consider
>> > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Register-Basics.html and let's
>> > assume that FIXED_REGISTERS in class
> On Oct 18, 2016, at 1:27 PM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
>
>>
>> On Oct 17, 2016, at 7:21 PM, Pat Haugen wrote:
>>
>> On 10/17/2016 08:17 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
The patch here, https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg01872.html,
attempted to scale down the register limit used b
> On Oct 17, 2016, at 7:21 PM, Pat Haugen wrote:
>
> On 10/17/2016 08:17 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
>>> The patch here, https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg01872.html,
>>> attempted to scale down the register limit used by -fsched-pressure for the
>>> case where the block in question
On 10/17/2016 08:17 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
>> The patch here, https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg01872.html,
>> attempted to scale down the register limit used by -fsched-pressure for the
>> case where the block in question executes as frequently as the entry block
>> to just the c
> On Oct 7, 2016, at 6:08 PM, Pat Haugen wrote:
>
> The patch here, https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg01872.html,
> attempted to scale down the register limit used by -fsched-pressure for the
> case where the block in question executes as frequently as the entry block to
> just the
The patch here, https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg01872.html,
attempted to scale down the register limit used by -fsched-pressure for the
case where the block in question executes as frequently as the entry block to
just the call_clobbered (i.e. call_used) regs. But the code is actua
11 matches
Mail list logo
