Hi!
On Wed, 23 Jul 2014 20:54:24 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-07-23 at 15:00 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > In context of adding support for OpenACC, next to the existing
> > GIMPLE_OMP_TARGET (quoting from gcc/gimple.def and gcc/gimple.h):
> >
> > DEFGSCODE(GIMPLE_OMP_TARGE
Hi!
In context of adding support for OpenACC, next to the existing
GIMPLE_OMP_TARGET (quoting from gcc/gimple.def and gcc/gimple.h):
DEFGSCODE(GIMPLE_OMP_TARGET, "gimple_omp_target", GSS_OMP_PARALLEL_LAYOUT)
/* GIMPLE_OMP_TARGET */
struct GTY((tag("GSS_OMP_PARALLEL_LAYOUT")))
g
On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 12:34 -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/25/13 08:35, David Malcolm wrote:
> >
> > I'm not a fan of these "_layout" names, but I'm not sure what better to
> > call them. Perhaps:
> > GSS_OMP_PARALLEL_LAYOUT -> GSS_OMP_WITH_CLAUSES_CHILD_FN_DATA_ARG
> > GSS_OMP_SINGLE_L
On 11/25/13 08:35, David Malcolm wrote:
I'm not a fan of these "_layout" names, but I'm not sure what better to
call them. Perhaps:
GSS_OMP_PARALLEL_LAYOUT -> GSS_OMP_WITH_CLAUSES_CHILD_FN_DATA_ARG
GSS_OMP_SINGLE_LAYOUT -> GSS_OMP_WITH_CLAUSES
GSS_OMP_ATOMIC_STORE_LAYOUT ->
Hi,
On Mon, 25 Nov 2013, David Malcolm wrote:
> I'm not a fan of these "_layout" names, but I'm not sure what better to
> call them. Perhaps:
>GSS_OMP_PARALLEL_LAYOUT -> GSS_OMP_WITH_CLAUSES_CHILD_FN_DATA_ARG
>GSS_OMP_SINGLE_LAYOUT -> GSS_OMP_WITH_CLAUSES
>GSS_OMP_ATOMIC_STO
On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 18:03 -0500, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> On 11/21/2013 05:42 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 03:24:55PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> >> On 11/21/13 15:19, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 03:25:52PM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > So is there
