> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:12:31AM -0800, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On 02/10/2012 06:25 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > PR middle-end/51929
> > > * cgraphunit.c (verify_edge_corresponds_to_fndecl): If node is
> > > a same_body_alias, also test whether e->callee isn't a former
> > > or curre
On 02/14/2012 11:49 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Do we want a similar change to the use of former_clone_of in
cgraph_update_edges_for_call_stmt_node?
I don't think so.
Then let's say the patch is OK tomorrow unless Jan objects today.
Jason
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:12:31AM -0800, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 02/10/2012 06:25 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > PR middle-end/51929
> > * cgraphunit.c (verify_edge_corresponds_to_fndecl): If node is
> > a same_body_alias, also test whether e->callee isn't a former
> > or current c
On 02/10/2012 06:25 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
PR middle-end/51929
* cgraphunit.c (verify_edge_corresponds_to_fndecl): If node is
a same_body_alias, also test whether e->callee isn't a former
or current clone of the decl this is a same body alias of.
Do we want a s
Hi!
As discussed in the PR, this is a verification ICE if a call stmt
calls a same_body_alias (__comp_ctor) and IPA-CP decides to clone the
ctor, it clones the function with the body (__base_ctor), but
before the call stmts are updated, the checking fails because
the clone isn't clone or former cl
