On 12/08/2016 02:08 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
Right. Which is because they act as normal template parameters rather
than like the auto type-specifier does in, say, a variable declaration.
But indeed this produces bad mangling, and using Da in the mangling of a
generic lambda seems reasonable. Y
On 12/07/2016 01:30 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
This patch fixes the generic lambda mangling bug that caused the
demangler to infinitely recurse (78252). The generic's auto parms fail
the is_auto check because that's testing for the 'auto' identifier,
whereas the parms are distinct template type p
This patch fixes the generic lambda mangling bug that caused the
demangler to infinitely recurse (78252). The generic's auto parms fail
the is_auto check because that's testing for the 'auto' identifier,
whereas the parms are distinct template type parms named 'auto:$N'.
Amending is_auto to do
