On Mon, 2016-12-19 at 15:10 -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 12/08/2016 01:39 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > Testing the patch kit on i686 showed numerous failures of this
> > assertion in set_mem_attributes_minus_bitpos in emit-rtl.c:
> >
> > 1821gcc_assert (!defattrs->offset_known_p);
> >
>
On 12/08/2016 01:39 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
Testing the patch kit on i686 showed numerous failures of this
assertion in set_mem_attributes_minus_bitpos in emit-rtl.c:
1821gcc_assert (!defattrs->offset_known_p);
when expanding "main" in the rtl.exp test files, after parsing
an __RTL-t
On 12/08/2016 09:39 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
OK as adjustments to patches 8a and 8b?
Ok. Is it possible to adjust these macros to return something like a
const reference to ensure people can't make this kind of error?
Bernd
Testing the patch kit on i686 showed numerous failures of this
assertion in set_mem_attributes_minus_bitpos in emit-rtl.c:
1821gcc_assert (!defattrs->offset_known_p);
when expanding "main" in the rtl.exp test files, after parsing
an __RTL-tagged function.
Root cause is various assignme