On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 10:02:27AM -0500, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
> On 2019-02-07 3:09 p.m., Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 03:04:21PM -0500, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
> >> 2019-02-07 Michael Ploujnikov
> >>
> >>PR middle-end/89150
> >>* bitmap.c (test_bitmap_tree_mar
On 2019-02-07 3:09 p.m., Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 03:04:21PM -0500, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
>> 2019-02-07 Michael Ploujnikov
>>
>> PR middle-end/89150
>> * bitmap.c (test_bitmap_tree_marking): New test.
>> (NOT_NULL_OR_GARBAGE): For shortening
>> test_
On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 03:04:21PM -0500, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
> 2019-02-07 Michael Ploujnikov
>
> PR middle-end/89150
> * bitmap.c (test_bitmap_tree_marking): New test.
> (NOT_NULL_OR_GARBAGE): For shortening
> test_bitmap_tree_marking.
> (bitmap_c_tests): Ad
On 2019-02-04 11:39 a.m., Richard Biener wrote:
> On February 4, 2019 5:07:00 PM GMT+01:00, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 2/4/19 6:15 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>
>>> When I introduced tree-form bitmaps I forgot to think about GC.
>>> The following drops the chain_prev annotation to make the marker
>>> w
On 2/4/19 9:07 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 2/4/19 6:15 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> When I introduced tree-form bitmaps I forgot to think about GC.
>> The following drops the chain_prev annotation to make the marker
>> work for trees. I've also maked the obstack member GTY skip
>> (and prevent bit
On February 4, 2019 5:07:00 PM GMT+01:00, Jeff Law wrote:
>On 2/4/19 6:15 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> When I introduced tree-form bitmaps I forgot to think about GC.
>> The following drops the chain_prev annotation to make the marker
>> work for trees. I've also maked the obstack member GTY
On 2/4/19 6:15 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> When I introduced tree-form bitmaps I forgot to think about GC.
> The following drops the chain_prev annotation to make the marker
> work for trees. I've also maked the obstack member GTY skip
> (and prevent bitmap_obstack from gengtype processing) bec
On Mon, 4 Feb 2019, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 2:16 PM Richard Biener wrote:
> > When I introduced tree-form bitmaps I forgot to think about GC.
> > The following drops the chain_prev annotation to make the marker
> > work for trees.
>
> I don't understand this patch. How ar
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 2:16 PM Richard Biener wrote:
> When I introduced tree-form bitmaps I forgot to think about GC.
> The following drops the chain_prev annotation to make the marker
> work for trees.
I don't understand this patch. How are the nodes in a bitmap tree now
to be found for marking
When I introduced tree-form bitmaps I forgot to think about GC.
The following drops the chain_prev annotation to make the marker
work for trees. I've also maked the obstack member GTY skip
(and prevent bitmap_obstack from gengtype processing) because
the obstack isn't used for GC allocated bitma
10 matches
Mail list logo
