On Mon, 26 Nov 2018, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 04:36:26PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > With the relatex outer loop reduction support we need to avoid picking
> > up a different nested cycles reduction def. That's easy given we
> > record the PHI we are looking at - a
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 04:36:26PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> With the relatex outer loop reduction support we need to avoid picking
> up a different nested cycles reduction def. That's easy given we
> record the PHI we are looking at - almost, at least.
Thanks for fixing it. Just a nit,
With the relatex outer loop reduction support we need to avoid picking
up a different nested cycles reduction def. That's easy given we
record the PHI we are looking at - almost, at least.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied to trunk.
Richard.
2018-11-26 Richard Bien