On Fri, 15 Mar 2019, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >
> > A previous patch of mine correcting the vectorizer target cost model
> > to properly cost scalar FP ops vs. scalar INT ops regressed
> > 416.gamess by ~10% on all modern x86 archs.
> >
> > The following mitigates this in the cost modeling by notici
>
> A previous patch of mine correcting the vectorizer target cost model
> to properly cost scalar FP ops vs. scalar INT ops regressed
> 416.gamess by ~10% on all modern x86 archs.
>
> The following mitigates this in the cost modeling by noticing
> the vectorized loop in question has all loads an
A previous patch of mine correcting the vectorizer target cost model
to properly cost scalar FP ops vs. scalar INT ops regressed
416.gamess by ~10% on all modern x86 archs.
The following mitigates this in the cost modeling by noticing
the vectorized loop in question has all loads and stores perf
