Re: [PATCH] Fix PR79547

2017-04-21 Thread Richard Biener
On Fri, 17 Feb 2017, Richard Biener wrote: > On Thu, 16 Feb 2017, Richard Biener wrote: > > > > > I am testing the following patch for PR79547. Those builtins do not > > return anything that can be used to re-construct the pointer(s) passed > > to them. > > > > Queued for GCC 8. > > Actually

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR79547

2017-02-17 Thread Richard Biener
On Fri, 17 Feb 2017, Marc Glisse wrote: > On Fri, 17 Feb 2017, Richard Biener wrote: > > > On Thu, 16 Feb 2017, Richard Biener wrote: > > > > > > > > I am testing the following patch for PR79547. Those builtins do not > > > return anything that can be used to re-construct the pointer(s) passed

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR79547

2017-02-17 Thread Marc Glisse
On Fri, 17 Feb 2017, Richard Biener wrote: On Thu, 16 Feb 2017, Richard Biener wrote: I am testing the following patch for PR79547. Those builtins do not return anything that can be used to re-construct the pointer(s) passed to them. Queued for GCC 8. Actually we need calluse constraints.

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR79547

2017-02-17 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, 16 Feb 2017, Richard Biener wrote: > > I am testing the following patch for PR79547. Those builtins do not > return anything that can be used to re-construct the pointer(s) passed > to them. > > Queued for GCC 8. Actually we need calluse constraints. Thus adjusted as follows. Richard

[PATCH] Fix PR79547

2017-02-16 Thread Richard Biener
I am testing the following patch for PR79547. Those builtins do not return anything that can be used to re-construct the pointer(s) passed to them. Queued for GCC 8. Richard. 2017-02-16 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/79547 * tree-ssa-structalias.c (find_func_aliases_fo