Hi Richard, Catherine, Matthew
On Thu, 2017-03-02 14:40:46 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
[...]
> On IRC we decided to wait&see for the TREE_NO_WARNING issue. So the
> following is what I committed.
>
> Bootstrapped / tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
[...]
> 2017-03-02 Richard Biener
>
>
On 03/01/2017 07:03 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
The following addresses a regression in uninit warnings that happens
because clobber stmts preclude the very simple-minded support we have
for memory. The patch fixes this by instead implementing uninit
warnings for memory properly, using the alias
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 03:03:29PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > One issue with the patch is duplicate warnings as TREE_NO_WARNING
> > > doesn't work very well on tcc_reference trees which are not
> >
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 03:03:29PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > One issue with the patch is duplicate warnings as TREE_NO_WARNING
> > doesn't work very well on tcc_reference trees which are not
> > shared. A followup could use some sort of hash table
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 03:03:29PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> One issue with the patch is duplicate warnings as TREE_NO_WARNING
> doesn't work very well on tcc_reference trees which are not
> shared. A followup could use some sort of hash table to mitigate
Can't we use TREE_NO_WARNING on get_
The following addresses a regression in uninit warnings that happens
because clobber stmts preclude the very simple-minded support we have
for memory. The patch fixes this by instead implementing uninit
warnings for memory properly, using the alias oracle walk_aliased_vdefs
helper.
The patch add
