Re: [PATCH] Fix PR69951

2016-03-04 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, 3 Mar 2016, Christophe Lyon wrote: > On 2 March 2016 at 10:49, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > On 2 March 2016 at 10:16, James Greenhalgh wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 05:56:30PM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote: > >>> On 1 March 2016 at 10:51, James Greenhalgh > >>> wrote: > >>> > On Tue

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR69951

2016-03-03 Thread Christophe Lyon
On 2 March 2016 at 10:49, Christophe Lyon wrote: > On 2 March 2016 at 10:16, James Greenhalgh wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 05:56:30PM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote: >>> On 1 March 2016 at 10:51, James Greenhalgh wrote: >>> > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: >>>

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR69951

2016-03-02 Thread Christophe Lyon
On 2 March 2016 at 10:16, James Greenhalgh wrote: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 05:56:30PM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote: >> On 1 March 2016 at 10:51, James Greenhalgh wrote: >> > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: >> >> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote: >> >> >

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR69951

2016-03-02 Thread James Greenhalgh
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 05:56:30PM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote: > On 1 March 2016 at 10:51, James Greenhalgh wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > >> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote: > >> > >> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:32:53AM +0100, Richard B

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR69951

2016-03-01 Thread Christophe Lyon
On 1 March 2016 at 10:51, James Greenhalgh wrote: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: >> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote: >> >> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:32:53AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: >> > > >> > > The following fixes PR69951, hopefully the last

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR69951

2016-03-01 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists)
On 01/03/16 10:49, Richard Biener wrote: > On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: > >> >> >> On 01/03/16 09:54, Richard Biener wrote: >>> On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, James G

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR69951

2016-03-01 Thread Prathamesh Kulkarni
On 1 March 2016 at 16:19, Richard Biener wrote: > On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: > >> >> >> On 01/03/16 09:54, Richard Biener wrote: >> > On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote: >> > >> >> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 29 Feb 20

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR69951

2016-03-01 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: > > > On 01/03/16 09:54, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > >>> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote: > >>> > On Fri, Feb 26,

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR69951

2016-03-01 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
On 01/03/16 09:54, Richard Biener wrote: > On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: >>> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:32:53AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > > The fo

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR69951

2016-03-01 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:32:53AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > > > > > > > > The following fixes PR69951, hopefully the last

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR69951

2016-03-01 Thread James Greenhalgh
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:32:53AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > > > > > > The following fixes PR69951, hopefully the last case of decl alias > > > issues with alias analysis. Th

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR69951

2016-03-01 Thread Richard Biener
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:32:53AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > > > > The following fixes PR69951, hopefully the last case of decl alias > > issues with alias analysis. This time it's points-to and the DECL_UIDs > > used in points-to sets not bein

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR69951

2016-02-29 Thread James Greenhalgh
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:32:53AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > > The following fixes PR69951, hopefully the last case of decl alias > issues with alias analysis. This time it's points-to and the DECL_UIDs > used in points-to sets not being canonicalized. > > The simplest (and cheapest) fix is

[PATCH] Fix PR69951

2016-02-26 Thread Richard Biener
The following fixes PR69951, hopefully the last case of decl alias issues with alias analysis. This time it's points-to and the DECL_UIDs used in points-to sets not being canonicalized. The simplest (and cheapest) fix is to make aliases refer to the ultimate alias target via their DECL_PT_UID wh