On 10/01/14 11:03, Xinliang David Li wrote:
Probably need to file a bug to track the copyrename2 problem.
Yea, that would definitely be appreciated.
Jeff
On 10/01/14 10:59, Teresa Johnson wrote:
This patch removes some asserts my jump threading patch r215739 added.
An upstream pass (copyrename2) is introducing some bogus profile
counts, so we can't assert that counts are 0 when there is no profile
data for the function.
Tested on testcase attache
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> Probably need to file a bug to track the copyrename2 problem.
I have filed https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63443 to track this.
>
> David
>
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>> This patch removes some
Probably need to file a bug to track the copyrename2 problem.
David
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> This patch removes some asserts my jump threading patch r215739 added.
> An upstream pass (copyrename2) is introducing some bogus profile
> counts, so we can't assert that
This patch removes some asserts my jump threading patch r215739 added.
An upstream pass (copyrename2) is introducing some bogus profile
counts, so we can't assert that counts are 0 when there is no profile
data for the function.
Tested on testcase attached to PR63422. Currently running gcc
regress
