Richard Biener wrote:
>
> This fixes wrong answer from data-dependence analysis by realizing
> that _all_ (even non-evolving) indirect accesses cannot be constrained
> to a full object size. This also gets rid of that ugly
> DR_UNCONSTRAINED_BASE hack (but effectively make it always active).
>
This fixes wrong answer from data-dependence analysis by realizing
that _all_ (even non-evolving) indirect accesses cannot be constrained
to a full object size. This also gets rid of that ugly
DR_UNCONSTRAINED_BASE hack (but effectively make it always active).
Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linu
