On Thu, 14 Aug 2014, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> Dear Richie and Tobias,
>
> I OK'd this patch on 9th August but I now see that the posting bounced
> because of mime content emanating from my phone mail reader :-(
>
> I also thought that the patch is obvious.
I already applied it after your ap
Dear Richie and Tobias,
I OK'd this patch on 9th August but I now see that the posting bounced
because of mime content emanating from my phone mail reader :-(
I also thought that the patch is obvious.
Cheers
Paul
On 13 August 2014 23:22, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> sorry for the b
Hi Richard,
sorry for the belated reply due to spending lazily my time at the sea ...
The patch is okay - and I would even claim that it is obvious.
Regarding the data type, I have no idea why it uses a hard-coded 32bit
integer instead of a size-type one. I have added it as item to
https://gc
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> The following fixes PR61950 by properly initializing the _size field
> of the static constructor for the vtable init member. Previously
> gfortran would use a 64bit integer to initialize the 32bit size field
> (not sure why larger aggregates are not
The following fixes PR61950 by properly initializing the _size field
of the static constructor for the vtable init member. Previously
gfortran would use a 64bit integer to initialize the 32bit size field
(not sure why larger aggregates are not considered).
This breaks more sophisticated constant
