On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 04:42:39PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> This fixes PR60012 by considering TBAA for all DDRs in vectorizer
> dependence analysis because the vectorizer can rely on at least
> covering two scalar iterations.
>
> It _should_ be a regression from 4.4 but I can't make a tes
This fixes PR60012 by considering TBAA for all DDRs in vectorizer
dependence analysis because the vectorizer can rely on at least
covering two scalar iterations.
It _should_ be a regression from 4.4 but I can't make a testcase
that has two TBAA disambiguatable types and is vectorized with 4.4
it
