On Wed, 27 Mar 2013, Marek Polacek wrote:
> This fixes PR56695 where we ICEd because expand_vec_cond_expr
> doesn't expect that the result of a vector comparison is of
> TYPE_UNSIGNED type. So we unconditionally build a signed type now.
> We know that the result of vec comparison is e.g. { -1, 0,
This fixes PR56695 where we ICEd because expand_vec_cond_expr
doesn't expect that the result of a vector comparison is of
TYPE_UNSIGNED type. So we unconditionally build a signed type now.
We know that the result of vec comparison is e.g. { -1, 0, -1}
and that all elements have to be SI types.
Th
