On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 14:50 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 08:45:16AM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> > Eric, thanks -- fixed in trunk. Looks like I've missed the window for
> > 4.8.0. Is this OK for backport once 4.8 opens up again? (Copying
> > Richi/Jakub as well.)
>
> No
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 08:45:16AM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> Eric, thanks -- fixed in trunk. Looks like I've missed the window for
> 4.8.0. Is this OK for backport once 4.8 opens up again? (Copying
> Richi/Jakub as well.)
Not for 4.8.0 (this isn't a wrong-code, just missed-optimization, righ
Eric, thanks -- fixed in trunk. Looks like I've missed the window for
4.8.0. Is this OK for backport once 4.8 opens up again? (Copying
Richi/Jakub as well.)
Thanks,
Bill
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 17:31 +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > 2013-03-13 Bill Schmidt
> > Steven Bosscher
> >
> >
> 2013-03-13 Bill Schmidt
> Steven Bosscher
>
> PR rtl-optimization/56605
> * loop-iv.c (implies_p): Handle equal RTXs and subregs.
>
> gcc/testsuite:
>
> 2013-03-13 Bill Schmidt wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> PR rtl-optimization/56605
> * gcc.target/po
This patch (suggested by Steven B) removes some redundant loop
assertions that are currently being missed, resulting in redundant
branches appearing prior to many loops on powerpc64. Bootstrapped and
tested with no new regressions on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu. Ok for
trunk?
Thanks,
Bill
gcc:
