Re: [PATCH] Fix PR56365

2016-03-14 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On March 14, 2016 9:21:25 PM GMT+01:00, Richard Biener wrote: >On March 14, 2016 7:25:31 PM GMT+01:00, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer > wrote: >>On March 14, 2016 12:58:20 PM GMT+01:00, Richard Biener >> wrote: >>>+ >>>+ int test_01 (int a) >>>+ { >>>+ if (127 <= a) >> >>Shouldn't this be >= ? > >N

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR56365

2016-03-14 Thread Richard Biener
On March 14, 2016 7:25:31 PM GMT+01:00, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >On March 14, 2016 12:58:20 PM GMT+01:00, Richard Biener > wrote: >> >>I am testing the following patch to fix the regression in min/max >>detection introduced by comparison canonicalization like a < 267 >>to a <= 266. The p

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR56365

2016-03-14 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On March 14, 2016 12:58:20 PM GMT+01:00, Richard Biener wrote: > >I am testing the following patch to fix the regression in min/max >detection introduced by comparison canonicalization like a < 267 >to a <= 266. The patch allows us to identify all four min/max >cases in the testcase below. > >Bo

[PATCH] Fix PR56365

2016-03-14 Thread Richard Biener
I am testing the following patch to fix the regression in min/max detection introduced by comparison canonicalization like a < 267 to a <= 266. The patch allows us to identify all four min/max cases in the testcase below. Bootstrap and regtest running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Richard. 2016