On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 09:14 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
>
> > In cases where pointers and ints are cast back and forth, SLSR can be
> > tricked into introducing a multiply where one of the operands is of
> > pointer type. Don't do that!
> >
>
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
> In cases where pointers and ints are cast back and forth, SLSR can be
> tricked into introducing a multiply where one of the operands is of
> pointer type. Don't do that!
>
> Verified that the reduced test case in the PR is fixed with a
> cross-co
In cases where pointers and ints are cast back and forth, SLSR can be
tricked into introducing a multiply where one of the operands is of
pointer type. Don't do that!
Verified that the reduced test case in the PR is fixed with a
cross-compile to sh4-unknown-linux-gnu with -Os, which is the only k