On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
> On 05/12/2012 12:36 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
>> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Toon Moene wrote:
>
>
>>> On 05/11/2012 01:59 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>>
This fixes the dependency of vectorization of strided loads on
gather
On 05/12/2012 12:36 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Toon Moene wrote:
On 05/11/2012 01:59 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
This fixes the dependency of vectorization of strided loads on
gather support. For that to work we need to lift the restriction
in data-ref an
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Toon Moene wrote:
> On 05/11/2012 01:59 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
>> This fixes the dependency of vectorization of strided loads on
>> gather support. For that to work we need to lift the restriction
>> in data-ref analysis that requries a constant DR_STEP. F
On 05/11/2012 01:59 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
This fixes the dependency of vectorization of strided loads on
gather support. For that to work we need to lift the restriction
in data-ref analysis that requries a constant DR_STEP. Fortunately
fallout is small.
Would this also vectorize strid
This fixes the dependency of vectorization of strided loads on
gather support. For that to work we need to lift the restriction
in data-ref analysis that requries a constant DR_STEP. Fortunately
fallout is small.
As a side-effect the data-reference for strided loads now makes
sense (rather than
