On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 14:05 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, 16 May 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 11:45 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > > On Tue, 15 May 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
> > >
> > > > Ping.
> > >
> > > I don't like it too much - but ponderi
On Wed, 16 May 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 11:45 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 May 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
> >
> > > Ping.
> >
> > I don't like it too much - but pondering a bit over it I can't find
> > a nicer solution.
> >
> > So, ok.
> >
>
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 11:45 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, 15 May 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
>
> > Ping.
>
> I don't like it too much - but pondering a bit over it I can't find
> a nicer solution.
>
> So, ok.
>
> Thanks,
> Richard.
>
Agreed. I'm not fond of it either, and I fee
On Tue, 15 May 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
> Ping.
I don't like it too much - but pondering a bit over it I can't find
a nicer solution.
So, ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
> Thanks,
> Bill
>
> On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 22:04 -0500, William J. Schmidt wrote:
> > This fixes another statement-placement is
Ping.
Thanks,
Bill
On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 22:04 -0500, William J. Schmidt wrote:
> This fixes another statement-placement issue when reassociating
> expressions with repeated factors. Multiplies feeding into
> __builtin_powi calls were not getting placed properly ahead of them in
> some cases.
>
This fixes another statement-placement issue when reassociating
expressions with repeated factors. Multiplies feeding into
__builtin_powi calls were not getting placed properly ahead of them in
some cases.
Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu with no new
regressions. I've also
