On Mon, 27 Feb 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> This makes the patch for PR50444 less conservative by also looking
> at TYPE_ALIGN of the base we offset. I guess we do not need to
> worry about the '???' as IPA SRA uses sth different (see PR52402)
> and the only case I definitely see only creat
This makes the patch for PR50444 less conservative by also looking
at TYPE_ALIGN of the base we offset. I guess we do not need to
worry about the '???' as IPA SRA uses sth different (see PR52402)
and the only case I definitely see only creates an address of the
generated access.
Bootstrapped and
