On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> >
> > This fixes PR51039 - another case of mismatches with respect to
> > gimple_call_cannot_inline_p and gimple_check_call_matching_types.
> > The code in ipa-inline-analysis.c looks out-of-place and i
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> This fixes PR51039 - another case of mismatches with respect to
> gimple_call_cannot_inline_p and gimple_check_call_matching_types.
> The code in ipa-inline-analysis.c looks out-of-place and it doesn't
> check for a conservative setting - thus the p
This fixes PR51039 - another case of mismatches with respect to
gimple_call_cannot_inline_p and gimple_check_call_matching_types.
The code in ipa-inline-analysis.c looks out-of-place and it doesn't
check for a conservative setting - thus the patch removes the
code and instead adds verification cod