> > Index: gcc/ipa-pure-const.c
> > ===
> > --- gcc/ipa-pure-const.c (revision 215888)
> > +++ gcc/ipa-pure-const.c (working copy)
> > @@ -744,6 +744,8 @@ analyze_function (struct cgraph_node *fn, bool ipa
> > {
> > /* Thunk gets propa
Hi Honza,
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 16:57:42 +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> +cgraph_node::call_for_symbol_thunks_and_aliases_1 (bool (*callback)
> + (cgraph_node *, void *),
> + void *data,
> + bool include_overwritable,
> + bool exclude_virtual_thunks)
>
> Instead of adding _1 variant into public API,
+cgraph_node::call_for_symbol_thunks_and_aliases_1 (bool (*callback)
+(cgraph_node *, void *),
+ void *data,
+ bool include_overwritable,
+
.
> From: bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> CC: richard.guent...@gmail.com; hubi...@ucw.cz
> Subject: RE: [PING**3] [PATCH] Fix PR ipa/61190, 2nd editionâ
> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 13:43:18 +0100
>
>
>
> Ping...
>
>
> -
Ping...
> From: bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> CC: richard.guent...@gmail.com; hubi...@ucw.cz
> Subject: RE: [PING**2] [PATCH] Fix PR ipa/61190, 2nd editionâ
> Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:23:41 +0100
&
Ping again...
Thanks.
> From: bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
> To: hubi...@ucw.cz
> CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; richard.guent...@gmail.com
> Subject: [PING] [PATCH] Fix PR ipa/61190, 2nd edition
> Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 11:40:56 +0200
>
Ping...
see: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg00536.html
> Hi Honza,
>
>
> as you know, we have a wrong code bug, when a pure or const method is called
> via a virtual thunk.
> I had some more Ideas, how to fix that, but all of them had some serious
> draw-backs, so I leave the det
Hi Honza,
as you know, we have a wrong code bug, when a pure or const method is called
via a virtual thunk.
I had some more Ideas, how to fix that, but all of them had some serious
draw-backs, so I leave the details out...
But now I have a new insight, why the "obvious" fix for this serious c
Hi Honza,
On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 18:12:10, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 12:06:12, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Bernd Edlinger
>>> wrote:
Hi,
the test case g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p4736b.C is mis-compiled with with all
optimiz
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 12:06:12, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Bernd Edlinger
> > wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> the test case g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p4736b.C is mis-compiled with with all
> >> optimization levels, except -O0 and -Og. This probably started with gc
Hi,
On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 12:06:12, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Bernd Edlinger
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> the test case g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p4736b.C is mis-compiled with with all
>> optimization levels, except -O0 and -Og. This probably started with gcc
>> 4.7.x.
>>
>> T
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Bernd Edlinger
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the test case g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p4736b.C is mis-compiled with with all
> optimization levels, except -O0 and -Og. This probably started with gcc 4.7.x.
>
> The constructor Main::Main() is first inlined and then completely optimiz
Hi,
the test case g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p4736b.C is mis-compiled with with all
optimization levels, except -O0 and -Og. This probably started with gcc 4.7.x.
The constructor Main::Main() is first inlined and then completely optimized
away in the dce1 pass. But the thunk is still using the vtable,
13 matches
Mail list logo
