Re: [PATCH] Fix PR 58867: asan and ubsan tests not run for installed testing.

2014-09-24 Thread Maxim Ostapenko
Hi Andrew! I tried to run ASan and UBSan tests on installed toolchain, but failed because current GCC doesn't support this opportunity. I see, you had fixed this issue (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/286866/), but the patch wasn't applied to GCC. So, I wonder if you are going to commit th

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR 58867: asan and ubsan tests not run for installed testing.

2014-09-18 Thread Maxim Ostapenko
Hi Andrew! What is the status of this patch? Enabling ASan and UBSan testsuites is useful for testing installed toolchain, so I wonder if you are going to commit this. -Maxim

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR 58867: asan and ubsan tests not run for installed testing

2013-12-17 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 07:56:32AM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote: > * lib/ubsan-dg.exp (check_effective_target_fundefined_sanitizer): New > function. > (ubsan_init): Save off ALWAYS_CXXFLAGS. > (ubsan_finish): Restore ALWAYS_CXXFLAGS correctly. > * lib/asan-dg.exp (check_effective_target_faddress_san

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR 58867: asan and ubsan tests not run for installed testing

2013-12-14 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 7:56 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote: > Hi, > The problem here is that both asan and ubsan testsuite test if we > have set a library path before running the testsuite. This is > incorrect when running the already installed testing as there is no > path to set. > > This patch cha

[PATCH] Fix PR 58867: asan and ubsan tests not run for installed testing

2013-10-29 Thread Andrew Pinski
Hi, The problem here is that both asan and ubsan testsuite test if we have set a library path before running the testsuite. This is incorrect when running the already installed testing as there is no path to set. This patch changes it so it tests if the executable is able to be built/linked bef