On Fri, 13 Apr 2012, Andrey Belevantsev wrote:
> But of course I wrongly microoptimized the decision of whether an insn is
> "empty" as shown in PR 52715, so the right fix is to check the emptiness right
> before issuing the insn. Thus, the following patch is really needed (tested
> on ia64 and
Hello,
On 07.03.2012 15:46, Alexander Monakov wrote:
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012, Andrey Belevantsev wrote:
Hello,
This PR is again about insns that are recog'ed as>=0 but do not change the
processor state. As explained in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203#c8, I've tried experimenti
