2012/1/25 Andrey Belevantsev :
> Hello,
>
> This patch fixes another problem with sel-sched not happy having bbs with
> zero successors. Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64/linux.
>
> Again, this is not a regression as __builtin_unreachable did not exist
> before sel-sched, but the patch is very saf
Hello,
This patch fixes another problem with sel-sched not happy having bbs with
zero successors. Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64/linux.
Again, this is not a regression as __builtin_unreachable did not exist
before sel-sched, but the patch is very safe and obvious. It is my fault
not com
I'd like to ping Andrey's patch (quoted below).
Additionally, the following patch is needed to fix a different instance where
sel-sched does not expect quirky regions in the vicinity of
__builtin_unreachable.
Both patches were bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-linux, OK for trunk?
2011-10-25
Hello,
The problem here is the case where the selective scheduler doesn't expect
having a block with zero successors. The patch is near obvious which is
why it was forgotten for nearly half a year, but still it applies cleanly
and fixes the testcase, full testing is in progress. OK for trunk
