On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 12:32 AM Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 2:21 AM Andrew Pinski via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> > This was an oversight on my part not realizing that
> > comparisons in generic can have a non-boolean type.
> > This means if we have `(f < 0)
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 2:21 AM Andrew Pinski via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> This was an oversight on my part not realizing that
> comparisons in generic can have a non-boolean type.
> This means if we have `(f < 0) | !(f < 0)` we would
> optimize this to -1 rather than just 1.
> This patch just adds
This was an oversight on my part not realizing that
comparisons in generic can have a non-boolean type.
This means if we have `(f < 0) | !(f < 0)` we would
optimize this to -1 rather than just 1.
This patch just adds the check for the type of the comparisons
to be boolean type to keep the optimizat
