On 6/15/21 12:23 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 7:32 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/14/21 12:36 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 7:00 PM Giuliano Belinassi via Gcc-patches
wrote:
This patch proposes a fix to PR 100944 by improving the array
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 7:32 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 6/14/21 12:36 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 7:00 PM Giuliano Belinassi via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> This patch proposes a fix to PR 100944 by improving the array boundary
> >> computation wh
On 6/14/21 4:29 PM, Giuliano Belinassi wrote:
Hi,
I will give an quick answer to this mail. I will analyze carefully what
richi said when I have more time available.
On Mon, 2021-06-14 at 15:55 -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/13/21 11:00 AM, Giuliano Belinassi wrote:
This patch proposes a fix
Hi,
I will give an quick answer to this mail. I will analyze carefully what
richi said when I have more time available.
On Mon, 2021-06-14 at 15:55 -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 6/13/21 11:00 AM, Giuliano Belinassi wrote:
> > This patch proposes a fix to PR 100944 by improving the array
> > bou
On 6/13/21 11:00 AM, Giuliano Belinassi wrote:
This patch proposes a fix to PR 100944 by improving the array boundary
Thanks for the patch!
computation when the flexible array has no clear constructor: if no
constructor were found in the input code, we compute the size of the
array as:
of
On 6/14/21 12:36 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 7:00 PM Giuliano Belinassi via Gcc-patches
wrote:
This patch proposes a fix to PR 100944 by improving the array boundary
computation when the flexible array has no clear constructor: if no
constructor were found
On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 7:00 PM Giuliano Belinassi via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> This patch proposes a fix to PR 100944 by improving the array boundary
> computation when the flexible array has no clear constructor: if no
> constructor were found in the input code, we compute the size of the
> array
This patch proposes a fix to PR 100944 by improving the array boundary
computation when the flexible array has no clear constructor: if no
constructor were found in the input code, we compute the size of the
array as:
offset(array begin) - offset(next element in RECORD_TYPE)
If no next element
