On Tue, 15 Oct 2013, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> This makes sure that we do not record a signed GIV that we do not
> know whether it overflows or not. For the testcase IVOPTs else
> can end up replacing an unsigned computation with a signed one.
>
> Note that alternatively we may decide that it i
This makes sure that we do not record a signed GIV that we do not
know whether it overflows or not. For the testcase IVOPTs else
can end up replacing an unsigned computation with a signed one.
Note that alternatively we may decide that it is not desirable
for SCEV to return signed { 2147483643,