On 12/11/2015 01:13 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 07:30:59AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
So, to fix ICE on the following testcase, we can either do what the
patch
does, or could conditionalize both the calculate_dominance_info and
free_dominance_info in the convert_scalars_to
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 07:30:59AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> >So, to fix ICE on the following testcase, we can either do what the
> >patch
> >does, or could conditionalize both the calculate_dominance_info and
> >free_dominance_info in the convert_scalars_to_vector function (stv
> >pass)
> >on
On December 10, 2015 9:11:16 PM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek
wrote:
>Hi!
>
>It seems some passes in between the combiner and ira aren't prepared to
>update dominance info. It usually is not a problem, because already
>before
>the combiner we call free_dominance_info. But we now have a new i?86
>stv
On 12/10/2015 01:11 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
It seems some passes in between the combiner and ira aren't prepared to
update dominance info. It usually is not a problem, because already before
the combiner we call free_dominance_info. But we now have a new i?86
stv pass that is injected aft
Hi!
It seems some passes in between the combiner and ira aren't prepared to
update dominance info. It usually is not a problem, because already before
the combiner we call free_dominance_info. But we now have a new i?86
stv pass that is injected after the combiner that computes dominators but
do
