On 06/23/2014 08:55 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> Agreed, this is why cmpelim looks interesting for Thumb1. (We may need another
> hook or something to disable it in configurations we don't need it in, but you
> know ... )
Yeah. Feel free to change targetm.flags_regnum from a variable to a fu
On 23/06/14 15:01, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 06/23/2014 02:29 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On 20/06/14 21:28, Richard Henderson wrote:
There aren't too many users of the cmpelim pass, and previously they were all
small embedded targets without an FPU.
I'm a bit surprised that Ramana d
On 06/23/2014 02:29 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>
>
> On 20/06/14 21:28, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> There aren't too many users of the cmpelim pass, and previously they were all
>> small embedded targets without an FPU.
>>
>> I'm a bit surprised that Ramana decided to enable this pass for aa
On 20/06/14 21:28, Richard Henderson wrote:
There aren't too many users of the cmpelim pass, and previously they were all
small embedded targets without an FPU.
I'm a bit surprised that Ramana decided to enable this pass for aarch64, as
that target is not so limited as the block comment for th
There aren't too many users of the cmpelim pass, and previously they were all
small embedded targets without an FPU.
I'm a bit surprised that Ramana decided to enable this pass for aarch64, as
that target is not so limited as the block comment for the pass describes.
Honestly, whatever is being de
