On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 11:21 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> As I wrote in the PR, before PR81708 commits,
> while i386 defaulted to SSP_TLS rather than SSP_GLOBAL on everything but
> Android, the -mstack-protector-guard= switch controlled pretty much
> whether the i386.md special stack prote
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 11:21:18PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> As I wrote in the PR, before PR81708 commits,
Note, e.g. in 4.8, the stack_protector_* patterns weren't guarded with
something like TARGET_SSP_TLS_GUARD but with !TARGET_HAS_BIONIC,
which just means it was incorrectly implemented for
Hi!
As I wrote in the PR, before PR81708 commits,
while i386 defaulted to SSP_TLS rather than SSP_GLOBAL on everything but
Android, the -mstack-protector-guard= switch controlled pretty much
whether the i386.md special stack protector patterns are used (if tls)
or whether generic code is used (glo
