On 2/12/19 10:22 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
PING^1.
On 2/4/19 1:46 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 2/4/19 10:56 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
Hi.
Starting from r266926 'switch (e->value.op.op)' is reached when
one using -fdec. That's wrong as -fdec causes to create a e->value.function.
I hope the proper fi
PING^1.
On 2/4/19 1:46 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 2/4/19 10:56 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> Starting from r266926 'switch (e->value.op.op)' is reached when
>> one using -fdec. That's wrong as -fdec causes to create a e->value.function.
>> I hope the proper fix is to skip the mentioned pa
On 2/4/19 10:56 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Starting from r266926 'switch (e->value.op.op)' is reached when
> one using -fdec. That's wrong as -fdec causes to create a e->value.function.
> I hope the proper fix is to skip the mentioned patch and allow simplification
> at the end of the funct
Hi.
Starting from r266926 'switch (e->value.op.op)' is reached when
one using -fdec. That's wrong as -fdec causes to create a e->value.function.
I hope the proper fix is to skip the mentioned patch and allow simplification
at the end of the function?
Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and su
