On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 09:56:22AM +0400, Yury Gribov wrote:
> Now what bothers me is zero feedback from Dejagnu folks...
Come on, it's only been a couple of days. :-)
Ben
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> But if somebody is willing to maintain it for
> cross-testing
Yup, we'll do this.
Now what bothers me is zero feedback from Dejagnu folks...
-Y
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:42:12AM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Mar 25, 2014, at 7:31 AM, Yury Gribov wrote:
> > On 03/24/2014 01:46 PM, Maxim Ostapenko wrote:
> >>
> >> On 03/24/2014 12:28 PM, Maxim Ostapenko wrote:
> >>>
> >>> When porting Lsan on arm, I ran into problem with testing, because
On Mar 25, 2014, at 7:31 AM, Yury Gribov wrote:
> On 03/24/2014 01:46 PM, Maxim Ostapenko wrote:
>>
>> On 03/24/2014 12:28 PM, Maxim Ostapenko wrote:
>>>
>>> When porting Lsan on arm, I ran into problem with testing, because
>>> almost all lsan tests require environment variables forwarding for
Cc-ing Jakub cause he's the author of original set-target-env-var
support in GCC testsuite.
On 03/24/2014 01:46 PM, Maxim Ostapenko wrote:
Adding Dejagnu list this time.
On 03/24/2014 12:28 PM, Maxim Ostapenko wrote:
Hi all,
When porting Lsan on arm, I ran into problem with testing, because
Adding Dejagnu list this time.
On 03/24/2014 12:28 PM, Maxim Ostapenko wrote:
Hi all,
When porting Lsan on arm, I ran into problem with testing, because
almost all lsan tests require environment variables forwarding for
remote targets. Unfortunately, this feature isn't implemented yet
neithe
Hi all,
When porting Lsan on arm, I ran into problem with testing, because
almost all lsan tests require environment variables forwarding for
remote targets. Unfortunately, this feature isn't implemented yet
neither in Dejagnu nor in GCC. These two small patches seem to resolve
this issue.