On Fri, 14 Jun 2024, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 5:54 AM Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > Automatic arrays that are not address-taken should not be subject to
> > store data races.
>
> That seems conservative enough. Though I would think if the array
> never escaped the function
On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 5:54 AM Richard Biener wrote:
>
> Automatic arrays that are not address-taken should not be subject to
> store data races.
That seems conservative enough. Though I would think if the array
never escaped the function would be still correct and allow for more
arrays (but may
Automatic arrays that are not address-taken should not be subject to
store data races. This applies to OMP SIMD in-branch lowered
functions result array which for the testcase otherwise prevents
vectorization with SSE and for AVX and AVX512 ends up with spurious
.MASK_STORE to the stack surviving.
