On 12/01/2016 05:49 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Okay, thanks for the clarification. One other question though.
Why would the probability be near zero? In the absence of any
hints the expression 2 != sprintf(d, "%i", 12) should have
a very high probability of being true, near 100% in fact.
I ask be
On 12/01/2016 09:49 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Okay, thanks for the clarification. One other question though.
Why would the probability be near zero? In the absence of any
hints the expression 2 != sprintf(d, "%i", 12) should have
a very high probability of being true, near 100% in fact.
I ask be
Okay, thanks for the clarification. One other question though.
Why would the probability be near zero? In the absence of any
hints the expression 2 != sprintf(d, "%i", 12) should have
a very high probability of being true, near 100% in fact.
I ask because the test I referenced tries to verify t
On 12/01/2016 02:48 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 11/30/2016 11:46 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 11/24/2016 05:59 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 11/24/2016 09:29 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
Please guard with ! TDF_GIMPLE, otherwise the output will not be
parseable
with the GIMPLE FE.
RIchard.
Done and
On 11/30/2016 11:46 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 11/24/2016 05:59 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 11/24/2016 09:29 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
Please guard with ! TDF_GIMPLE, otherwise the output will not be parseable
with the GIMPLE FE.
RIchard.
Done and verified that and it provides equal dumps for
On 11/24/2016 05:59 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 11/24/2016 09:29 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
Please guard with ! TDF_GIMPLE, otherwise the output will not be parseable
with the GIMPLE FE.
RIchard.
Done and verified that and it provides equal dumps for -fdump*-gimple.
Installed as r242837.
Hi M
Martin
>From af3fffab592e545892317b2019845f247c36d0d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: marxin
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 14:11:48 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Dump probability for edges a frequency for BBs
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-11-11 Martin Liska
* gimple-pretty-print.c (dump_edge_probability): New function.
(dum
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> > LGTM. While I've often found a way to get this stuff when looking at
>> > probability updating code, having it in the standard dumps seems like a
>> > good
>> > enhancement.
>>
>> Please guard with ! TDF_GIMPLE, otherwise the output will
> > LGTM. While I've often found a way to get this stuff when looking at
> > probability updating code, having it in the standard dumps seems like a good
> > enhancement.
>
> Please guard with ! TDF_GIMPLE, otherwise the output will not be parseable
> with the GIMPLE FE.
Since gimple FE builds C
ts.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>> Martin
>>
>>
>> 0001-Dump-probability-for-edges-a-frequency-for-BBs.patch
>>
>>
>> From 5b7d8393564a0111698b58989ac74b45cf019701 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: marxin
>> Date: Wed,
ty-for-edges-a-frequency-for-BBs.patch
From 5b7d8393564a0111698b58989ac74b45cf019701 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: marxin
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 14:11:48 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Dump probability for edges a frequency for BBs
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-11-11 Martin Liska
* gimple-
rom: marxin
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 14:11:48 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Dump probability for edges a frequency for BBs
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-11-11 Martin Liska
* gimple-pretty-print.c (dump_edge_probability): New function.
(dump_gimple_switch): Dump label edge probabilities.
(dump_gimpl
12 matches
Mail list logo
