Re: [PATCH] Don't use ./tmp0 for site.exp generation

2011-04-21 Thread Richard Guenther
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, Rainer Orth wrote: > Richard Guenther writes: > > >> Perhaps it would be better to use site.tmp to match current git > >> automake? > > > > I can certainly use any other temporary name, just the tmp0 use > > is annoying ;) It's a matter of a single search-and-replace. > >

Re: [PATCH] Don't use ./tmp0 for site.exp generation

2011-04-21 Thread Rainer Orth
Richard Guenther writes: >> Perhaps it would be better to use site.tmp to match current git >> automake? > > I can certainly use any other temporary name, just the tmp0 use > is annoying ;) It's a matter of a single search-and-replace. Although this isn't exactly part of the testsuite itself, g

Re: [PATCH] Don't use ./tmp0 for site.exp generation

2011-04-19 Thread Richard Guenther
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011, Rainer Orth wrote: > Richard Guenther writes: > > > This patch sits in all my development trees because delta uses > > tmp? named directories for storing intermediate files. This causes > > a make check to fail. > > > > Maybe there is an even better way to create a truly te

Re: [PATCH] Don't use ./tmp0 for site.exp generation

2011-04-19 Thread Rainer Orth
Richard Guenther writes: > This patch sits in all my development trees because delta uses > tmp? named directories for storing intermediate files. This causes > a make check to fail. > > Maybe there is an even better way to create a truly temporary file > name (that is even portable), but the fo

[PATCH] Don't use ./tmp0 for site.exp generation

2011-04-19 Thread Richard Guenther
This patch sits in all my development trees because delta uses tmp? named directories for storing intermediate files. This causes a make check to fail. Maybe there is an even better way to create a truly temporary file name (that is even portable), but the following patch simply avoids using tmp