Re: [PATCH] Don't update_cfg_for_uncondjump for noop non-jump moves

2011-04-12 Thread Eric Botcazou
> Looks good to me, but please wait for Eric to chime in since you've been > discussing it with him already. Fine with me as well. -- Eric Botcazou

Re: [PATCH] Don't update_cfg_for_uncondjump for noop non-jump moves

2011-04-12 Thread Jeff Law
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/12/11 11:08, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 09:18:01AM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote: >>> The propagate_for_debug change alone could fix it, we should never >>> fall through into next basic block. We are unforuntately not deleting >

[PATCH] Don't update_cfg_for_uncondjump for noop non-jump moves

2011-04-12 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 09:18:01AM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote: > > The propagate_for_debug change alone could fix it, we should never > > fall through into next basic block. We are unforuntately not deleting > > just jumps (which ought to appear at the end of bbs), but also > > any other noop move