Re: [PATCH] Don't run guality.exp tests with LTO_TORTURE_OPTIONS.

2014-07-07 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, 3 Jul 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 09:41:15AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > > On July 3, 2014 7:37:13 AM CEST, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > >On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 04:06:30PM -0700, Jason Merrill wrote: > > >> I think that makes sense; I'm not aware of anyone working

Re: [PATCH] Don't run guality.exp tests with LTO_TORTURE_OPTIONS.

2014-07-04 Thread Richard Biener
On July 3, 2014 10:47:52 PM CEST, Mark Wielaard wrote: >On Thu, 2014-07-03 at 22:14 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 10:04:35PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: >> > On Thu, 2014-07-03 at 21:52 +0200, Richard Biener wrote: >> > > On July 3, 2014 8:38:14 PM CEST, Jakub Jelinek >wr

Re: [PATCH] Don't run guality.exp tests with LTO_TORTURE_OPTIONS.

2014-07-03 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Thu, 2014-07-03 at 22:14 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 10:04:35PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > On Thu, 2014-07-03 at 21:52 +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > > > On July 3, 2014 8:38:14 PM CEST, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > >On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 08:37:07PM +0200, Richard

Re: [PATCH] Don't run guality.exp tests with LTO_TORTURE_OPTIONS.

2014-07-03 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 10:04:35PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > On Thu, 2014-07-03 at 21:52 +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > > On July 3, 2014 8:38:14 PM CEST, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > >On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 08:37:07PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > > >> Well, simply removing the regression testi

Re: [PATCH] Don't run guality.exp tests with LTO_TORTURE_OPTIONS.

2014-07-03 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Thu, 2014-07-03 at 21:52 +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > On July 3, 2014 8:38:14 PM CEST, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > >On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 08:37:07PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > >> Well, simply removing the regression testing for LTO is a > >maintainance nightmare as well. > >> > >> The guali

Re: [PATCH] Don't run guality.exp tests with LTO_TORTURE_OPTIONS.

2014-07-03 Thread Richard Biener
On July 3, 2014 8:38:14 PM CEST, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 08:37:07PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: >> Well, simply removing the regression testing for LTO is a >maintainance nightmare as well. >> >> The guality testsuite is very noisy anyway with all the xfail and >xpass. > >L

Re: [PATCH] Don't run guality.exp tests with LTO_TORTURE_OPTIONS.

2014-07-03 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 08:37:07PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > Well, simply removing the regression testing for LTO is a maintainance > nightmare as well. > > The guality testsuite is very noisy anyway with all the xfail and xpass. Let's keep it as is then? Jakub

Re: [PATCH] Don't run guality.exp tests with LTO_TORTURE_OPTIONS.

2014-07-03 Thread Richard Biener
On July 3, 2014 9:55:36 AM CEST, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 09:41:15AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: >> On July 3, 2014 7:37:13 AM CEST, Jakub Jelinek >wrote: >> >On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 04:06:30PM -0700, Jason Merrill wrote: >> >> I think that makes sense; I'm not aware of anyo

Re: [PATCH] Don't run guality.exp tests with LTO_TORTURE_OPTIONS.

2014-07-03 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 09:41:15AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > On July 3, 2014 7:37:13 AM CEST, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > >On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 04:06:30PM -0700, Jason Merrill wrote: > >> I think that makes sense; I'm not aware of anyone working on > >improving LTO > >> debugging. > > > >I thin

Re: [PATCH] Don't run guality.exp tests with LTO_TORTURE_OPTIONS.

2014-07-03 Thread Richard Biener
On July 3, 2014 7:37:13 AM CEST, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 04:06:30PM -0700, Jason Merrill wrote: >> I think that makes sense; I'm not aware of anyone working on >improving LTO >> debugging. > >I think at this point all we care about is that with -flto we don't ICE >on >those,

Re: [PATCH] Don't run guality.exp tests with LTO_TORTURE_OPTIONS.

2014-07-02 Thread Richard Biener
On July 3, 2014 1:06:30 AM CEST, Jason Merrill wrote: >I think that makes sense; I'm not aware of anyone working on improving >LTO debugging. I've done that in the past. So it would be nice to verify we don't regress existing tests. Richard. >Jason

Re: [PATCH] Don't run guality.exp tests with LTO_TORTURE_OPTIONS.

2014-07-02 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 04:06:30PM -0700, Jason Merrill wrote: > I think that makes sense; I'm not aware of anyone working on improving LTO > debugging. I think at this point all we care about is that with -flto we don't ICE on those, perhaps we should arrange to change all the tests into dg-do co

Re: [PATCH] Don't run guality.exp tests with LTO_TORTURE_OPTIONS.

2014-07-02 Thread Jason Merrill
I think that makes sense; I'm not aware of anyone working on improving LTO debugging. Jason

[PATCH] Don't run guality.exp tests with LTO_TORTURE_OPTIONS.

2014-07-02 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, While writing new guality.exp tests I noticed they often just fail when ran with -flto, even though they PASS in all other cases. When I asked on irc about this I was told that LTO was known to not play well with DWARF debuginfo anyway. If that is the case, it seems better to disable -flto for