On Tue, Jul 28, 2020, 10:24 PM Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 12:16 AM Richard Biener
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 5:50 PM Fangrui Song wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2020-05-13, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > > >> Did I mention I dislike -fsplit-dwarf? ;)
> > > >
> > > >Seconded,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 7:24 AM Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 12:16 AM Richard Biener
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 5:50 PM Fangrui Song wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2020-05-13, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > > >> Did I mention I dislike -fsplit-dwarf? ;)
> > > >
> > > >Seconded
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 12:16 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 5:50 PM Fangrui Song wrote:
> >
> > On 2020-05-13, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > >> Did I mention I dislike -fsplit-dwarf? ;)
> > >
> > >Seconded, this will be confusing for almost all users. Since the option
> > >onl
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 5:50 PM Fangrui Song wrote:
>
> On 2020-05-13, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> >> Did I mention I dislike -fsplit-dwarf? ;)
> >
> >Seconded, this will be confusing for almost all users. Since the option only
> >affects debug info generation, it should be prefixed with 'g' in any ca
ed, 13 May 2020 08:27:29 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Don't make -gsplit-dwarf imply -g
-gsplit-dwarf introduces order dependency: it overrides previous -g0 and -g1.
Don't imply -g so that it can be plugged into a build without worrying
that unnecessary debugging information may be generate