On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> While reading tree-ssa-threadupdate.c I noticed that we're casting
> XNEWVEC's result. This isn't done anywhere else and the macro
> does the cast internally anyway, thus there's no need to repeat that.
> Also there was a typo in copyright
While reading tree-ssa-threadupdate.c I noticed that we're casting
XNEWVEC's result. This isn't done anywhere else and the macro
does the cast internally anyway, thus there's no need to repeat that.
Also there was a typo in copyright years, so I fixed that as well
while at it. Regtested/bootstrap