On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 07:56:16AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 07:43:27AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >> From 12c6ddcf67593ed7137764ca74043f1a9c2d8fda Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >> From: "H.J. Lu"
> >> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 201
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 07:43:27AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> From 12c6ddcf67593ed7137764ca74043f1a9c2d8fda Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: "H.J. Lu"
>> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:56:08 -0700
>> Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Don't build 32-bit libgomp
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 07:43:27AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> From 12c6ddcf67593ed7137764ca74043f1a9c2d8fda Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: "H.J. Lu"
>> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:56:08 -0700
>> Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Don't build 32-bit libgomp
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 07:43:27AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> From 12c6ddcf67593ed7137764ca74043f1a9c2d8fda Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: "H.J. Lu"
> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:56:08 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Don't build 32-bit libgomp with -march=i486 on x86-64
>
> Gcc uses the same -march= fo
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 8:08 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Gcc uses the same -march= for both -m32 and -m64 on x86-64 unless
> --with-arch-32= is used. There is no need for -march=i486 to compile
> 32-bit libgomp on x86-64.
>
> Tested on x86-64. OK for trunk?
>
> H.J.
> ---
> PR target/70454
>
Gcc uses the same -march= for both -m32 and -m64 on x86-64 unless
--with-arch-32= is used. There is no need for -march=i486 to compile
32-bit libgomp on x86-64.
Tested on x86-64. OK for trunk?
H.J.
---
PR target/70454
* configure.tgt (XCFLAGS): Don't add -march=i486 to compile
