Re: [PATCH] Don't allow unsafe reductions in graphite

2015-07-25 Thread Tom de Vries
On 24/07/15 22:20, Sebastian Pop wrote: Richard Biener wrote: On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Tom de Vries wrote: Currently bootstrapping and reg-testing on x86_64. OK for trunk? OK 5 and 4.9 release branches? Ok if Sebastian is fine with it. Ok to backport as well. Thanks Tom for the p

Re: [PATCH] Don't allow unsafe reductions in graphite

2015-07-24 Thread Sebastian Pop
Richard Biener wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Tom de Vries wrote: > > Currently bootstrapping and reg-testing on x86_64. > > > > OK for trunk? > > > > OK 5 and 4.9 release branches? > > Ok if Sebastian is fine with it. Ok to backport as well. Thanks Tom for the patches.

Re: [PATCH] Don't allow unsafe reductions in graphite

2015-07-23 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Tom de Vries wrote: > [ was: Re: [RFC, PR66873] Use graphite for parloops ] > > On 22/07/15 13:02, Richard Biener wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Richard Biener >> wrote: >>> >>> >On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote: >>To

[PATCH] Don't allow unsafe reductions in graphite

2015-07-22 Thread Tom de Vries
[ was: Re: [RFC, PR66873] Use graphite for parloops ] On 22/07/15 13:02, Richard Biener wrote: On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Richard Biener wrote: >On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote: >>Tom de Vries wrote: >>>Fix reduction safety checks >>> >>> * graphite-sese-to