On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:22:15AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > Hm, but you are testing vector modes in the path that is supposed to
> > handle shifts by a scalar. That looks odd. Also it should be easy
>
> No, I'm testing it in the path that is
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:22:15AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> Hm, but you are testing vector modes in the path that is supposed to
> handle shifts by a scalar. That looks odd. Also it should be easy
No, I'm testing it in the path that is supposed to handle shifts by a
vector. That block s
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> With the patch I'm going to post momentarily which adds vlshrv{4,2}di and
> vashlv{4,2}di patterns for -mavx2 vectorizable_shift ICEs, because the
> frontends for long_long_var1 << long_long_var2 emit long_long_var1 << (int)
> long_long_var2
>
Hi!
With the patch I'm going to post momentarily which adds vlshrv{4,2}di and
vashlv{4,2}di patterns for -mavx2 vectorizable_shift ICEs, because the
frontends for long_long_var1 << long_long_var2 emit long_long_var1 << (int)
long_long_var2
and vectorizable_shift isn't prepared to handle type prom
