Hi,
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 04:29:44PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >
> > * ipa-prop.h (jump_func_type): Updated comments.
> > (ipa_known_type_data): New type.
> > (ipa_jump_func): Use it to describe known type jump functions.
> > * ipa-prop.c (ipa_print_node_jump_functions_for_edg
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 04:29:44PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >
> > * ipa-prop.h (jump_func_type): Updated comments.
> > (ipa_known_type_data): New type.
> > (ipa_jump_func): Use it to describe known type jump functions.
> > * ipa-prop.c (ipa_print_node_jump_functions_for_edg
>
> * ipa-prop.h (jump_func_type): Updated comments.
> (ipa_known_type_data): New type.
> (ipa_jump_func): Use it to describe known type jump functions.
> * ipa-prop.c (ipa_print_node_jump_functions_for_edge): Updated to
> reflect the new known type jump function cont
Hi,
this patch is basically a followup to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-09/msg00398.html
The problem is that BINFOs coming from different compilation units and
which are streamed into jump-functions do not undergo any unification
in LTO and we have the same value represented by different
