On 1/7/2014 8:46 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
Correctness over speed is better. I am sorry GCC is the only one
which gets it correct here. If people don't like there is a flag to
disable it.
Obviously in a case like this, it is the programmer who should
be able to decide between fast-and-accepta
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Xinliang David Li
>> wrote:
>>> Can we revisit the decision for this? Here are the reasons:
>>>
>>> 1) It seems that the motivation to make C++
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>> Can we revisit the decision for this? Here are the reasons:
>>
>> 1) It seems that the motivation to make C++ consistent with c99 is to
>> avoid confusing users who build the C so
See the following code:
#include
using std::complex;
template
complex<_Tp>&
mult_assign (complex<_Tp>& __y, const complex<_Up>& __z)
{
_Up& _M_real = __y.real();
_Up& _M_imag = __y.imag();
const _Tp __r = _M_real * __z.real() - _M_imag * __z.imag();
_M_imag = _M_real * __z.imag() + _M_i
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> Can we revisit the decision for this? Here are the reasons:
>
> 1) It seems that the motivation to make C++ consistent with c99 is to
> avoid confusing users who build the C source with both C and C++
> compilers. Why should C++'s default
Can we revisit the decision for this? Here are the reasons:
1) It seems that the motivation to make C++ consistent with c99 is to
avoid confusing users who build the C source with both C and C++
compilers. Why should C++'s default behavior be tuned for this niche
case?
2) It is very confusing for
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Cong Hou wrote:
> This patch is for PR58963.
>
> In the patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg00560.html,
> the builtin function is used to perform complex multiplication and
> division. This is to comply with C99 standard, but I am wondering if
> C++
This patch is for PR58963.
In the patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg00560.html,
the builtin function is used to perform complex multiplication and
division. This is to comply with C99 standard, but I am wondering if
C++ also needs this.
There is no complex keyword in C++, and no
