On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 03:08:09PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 01:49:36PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > It reproduces on x86_64 too, I guess the reason why you aren't seeing this
> > is that you might have too old assembler that doesn't support
> > avx2 instructions (you
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 01:49:36PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> It reproduces on x86_64 too, I guess the reason why you aren't seeing this
> is that you might have too old assembler that doesn't support
> avx2 instructions (you actually don't need avx2 hw to reproduce, any
> x86_64 or i686 just wi
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 01:33:54PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
> I am aware this problem has been reported but my problem is that I
> cannot reproduce it anywhere. The tests pass on x86_64 host and the
> only i686 host I use is gcc45 on gcc farm where these tests are
> skipped. It is very likely
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 12:11:45PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 03:28:59PM +, Zamyatin, Igor wrote:
> > Likely after this was checked in appeared following on x86
> >
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-simd-clone-11.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (internal
> > compiler error)
> >
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 03:28:59PM +, Zamyatin, Igor wrote:
> Likely after this was checked in appeared following on x86
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-simd-clone-11.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (internal
> compiler error)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-simd-clone-11.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for
>
to:gcc-patches-
> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Martin Jambor
> Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 9:37 PM
> To: GCC Patches
> Cc: Jan Hubicka
> Subject: [PATCH] Do not run IPA transform phases multiple times
>
> Hi,
>
> I have noticed that we often run IPA-transformation phase
> Hi,
>
> I have noticed that we often run IPA-transformation phases multiple
> times. The reason is that when a virtual clone is created, it starts
> with an empty ipa_transforms_to_apply vector and all subsequent IPA
> passes that see it are pushed onto it. The original node gets these
> pushe
Hi,
I have noticed that we often run IPA-transformation phases multiple
times. The reason is that when a virtual clone is created, it starts
with an empty ipa_transforms_to_apply vector and all subsequent IPA
passes that see it are pushed onto it. The original node gets these
pushed on their ipa
